Phase 1 – Frame the Performance Question

1.0 Introduction

The first phase of the Performance Intelligence Cycle (PIC) is often the most neglected in traditional performance management. Too many organisations leap straight into measurement without asking the foundational question: What do we need to know to make better decisions?

Framing the right performance question is the compass for the entire cycle. It defines purpose, direction, and alignment. Without it, measurement becomes noise.

2.0 Purpose and Objectives

Purpose

  • Translate business context into focused, actionable questions
  • Align performance monitoring to strategic, operational, or experiential needs
  • Set the direction for metrics, data, and reporting that follow

Objectives

  • Develop one or more clear performance questions aligned to value, risk, or improvement goals
  • Ensure traceability between the question and business drivers
  • Secure agreement on ownership, purpose, and audience of each question
3.0 Inputs, Outputs, Tools and Techniques

Inputs

  • Organisational strategy, KPIs, and delivery roadmaps
  • Risk, audit, and incident data
  • Voice of the customer/employee feedback
  • Regulatory or contractual obligations

Outputs

  • Approved performance question(s) with contextual rationale
  • Documented ownership and reporting scope
  • Draft insight requirements and impact areas

Tools and Techniques

  • Performance Question Canvas: Define drivers, audiences, and decision links
  • Value Linkage Map: Align questions with strategic objectives or delivery outcomes
  • Stakeholder Mapping Grid: Understand the purpose, priority, and needs of stakeholders
  • Facilitated Workshops: Used to co-create consensus and reduce later resistance
4.0 Process Steps (Activity Breakdown)

Step 1: Analyse Context and Intent

  • Conduct document review of strategic plans, KPIs, audits, or feedback channels

  • Interview or survey key stakeholders to surface performance pain points

  • Identify recurring complaints, unmeasured areas, or emerging risks

Step 2: Frame Performance Questions

  • Use framing prompts (“How well are we…”, “To what extent do we…”)

  • Avoid binary or overly simplistic questions

  • Ensure questions link to decisions or actions (e.g. improve, reassign, escalate)

Step 3: Map Value and Ownership

  • Use the Value Linkage Map to trace each question to an outcome or decision

  • Assign an owner responsible for maintaining the question and acting on results

  • Confirm governance alignment for review, escalation, or update cycles

Step 4: Validate with Stakeholders

  • Conduct lightweight testing of draft questions with users

  • Iterate to ensure understanding and relevance

  • Record rationale and use cases in your portfolio or service records

Step 5: Finalise and Record

  • Final approval of questions and owners

  • Document in a performance question log (linked to metrics registry in Phase 2)

  • Link to service artefacts, governance reports, or improvement portfolios

5.0 Role Examples (RACI by Org Size)
Org Type Responsible Accountable Consulted Informed
Solo Owner Owner Mentor Stakeholders
SME Performance Lead Department Head SMEs, PMO Team Leads
Enterprise Service Owner Strategy/Portfolio Governance Business, Data, Legal Exec Leadership

6.0 Tips for Deployment
  • Start small: one well-formed question is a better foundation than a library of weak ones

  • Use collaborative language: “We want to understand…” instead of “You need to show…”

  • Reinforce that performance questions are not audits—they are tools for improvement

  • Revisit performance questions quarterly to ensure continued relevance

  • Maintain a clear record of question history, changes, and ownership transitions

7.0 Example Performance Questions
  • To what extent are we delivering outcomes that align with strategic commitments?

  • Where do customer touchpoints most frequently result in dissatisfaction?

  • Which capabilities are most susceptible to performance degradation under demand?

  • How well are teams using available resources to meet delivery goals?

  • What percentage of incidents are linked to recurring service design flaws?

8.0 Integration and Interoperability
  • COBIT (APO08): Aligns with defining metrics that support strategic objectives and ensure control effectiveness

  • ITIL (Continual Improvement): Reflects Step 1 of the improvement model (“What is the vision?”)

  • OKRs: Questions form the basis of objectives, enabling better-designed key results

  • Balanced Scorecard: Helps position the question within one or more perspectives (financial, customer, internal, learning)

9.0 Lever Activation Guidance
  • Governance & Alignment: Provides accountability for question ownership and action pathways

  • Experience & Outcomes: Ensures questions reflect end-user or stakeholder experience, not just internal targets

  • Design & Flow: Helps position questions within system-wide process maps or architectural elements

A well-framed performance question turns uncertainty into insight. It enables the rest of the cycle to deliver value—not just visibility.

Username:
Password:
Remember Me